01344 379777software@trl.co.uk
FacebookTwitterYouTubeLinkedin
  • TRL Main Site
  • Careers
  • Publications
Top Menu
Search
Cart0
  • No products in the cart.

Subtotal: £0

View Cart Checkout

TRL SoftwareTRL Software
TRL Software
World Class Traffic & Transportation Software Solutions
  • Products
    • Junction & Signal Design
      • Junctions
        • ARCADY
        • PICADY
        • OSCADY
      • PCMOVA
      • TRANSYT
    • Traffic Control
      • MOVA
      • MotorGraph
      • SCOOT™
      • TRANSYT Online
    • Road Safety
      • iMAAP
      • Street Auditing
    • Economic Appraisal
      • HDM-4
    • Asset Management
      • iROADS
  • Services
    • Junction Analysis
    • Microsimulation Services
    • Signal Control
    • Road Safety
    • Software Development
    • Strategic Modelling
  • About
    • TRL Software
    • Quality Standards
    • Careers
  • News
  • Support
    • Training
    • Knowledge Base
    • Videos
    • Support Options
    • Maintenance Agreement
    • Licencing
    • Online Store Help
  • Contact
Menu back  
TRL Software > Support & Training > Articles > Measuring queues – is it all a waste of time?

Measuring queues – is it all a waste of time?

Measuring queues seems to be the obvious way of checking a model, because queue lengths are one of the main outputs from the programs. In fact some traffic engineers, and their customers, insist on such checks being carried out. If so, they should understand the implications of what they are doing. Apart from the practical difficulties of measuring mean queues over successive time intervals there are also mathematical problems to consider.

During peak periods (when the flow/capacity ratios are high) there is a large daily variation in queue lengths even if the average flow for each time segment does not vary from day to day. To take a typical example, a mean queue of 26 pcu would be derived from queues which varied between 5 pcu and 50 pcu from day to day. In fact, on 1 day in 20 the queue would be outside even this large envelope of possible values. So you can see that many days of queue measurements would have to be taken to obtain a reliable estimate of mean queues. The junction model predictions are based on an infinite number of days! It is surprising how many people think that one day is enough – yet they wouldn’t dream of predicting the result of the next General Election after canvassing one person chosen at random (OK maybe this is a more extreme case!)

The routine within the junction models which calculates mean queues is more accurate than the capacity-predicting routine, which of necessity gives average results which ignore the effects of site peculiarities and location. The queue calculation is almost certainly more accurate than your best estimate of demand flows. So if you do go to the trouble and expense of measuring queues, and find a difference between the model predictions and your observations, then you might pause to consider whether perhaps the model is correct and your queues are not. Even if your measured discrepancy is genuine, you will have achieved nothing other than to demonstrate that the demand flows are inaccurate or that the model’s capacity prediction is not taking account of all the local circumstances. So time would be better spent tackling these issues.

Consider the accuracy of the demand flow estimates in the model (bear in mind that ODTAB is the least accurate method of specifying them but the most frequently used). The accuracy of the model’s capacity prediction can be significantly improved by carrying out a “site specific capacity correction” – refer to the Application Guide for details. Such on-site measurements are much easier and cheaper than trying to measure queues properly!

If the flows and capacity-predictions are correct, the queue predictions will be correct.

Categories
  • ARCADY Modelling
  • ARCADY/PICADY/OSCADY Technical
  • Other products
  • PICADY Modelling
  • TRANSYT Modelling
  • TRANSYT NetCon Diagrams
  • TRANSYT Technical
Sources
  • Enquiry
  • TRL Software
  • Traffic Software News
Recent Articles

  • Automatically calculating future traffic flows using growth factors

  • Graphs showing sensitivity of geometric parameters

  • How can I transfer traffic data between Junctions and Excel?

  • Pedestrian crossing and blocking on the same road

  • Out of memory error when saving files

Stay up to date with news from TRL Software

Sign up
Products
  • Junction & Signal Design
  • Traffic Control
  • Road Safety
  • Economic Appraisal
  • Asset Management
Services
  • Junction Analysis
  • Microsimulation Services
  • Signal Control
  • Software Development
  • Strategic Modelling
Contact Us

01344 379777
software@trl.co.uk

TRL Limited
Crowthorne House
Nine Mile Ride
Wokingham
Berkshire
RG40 3GA

TRL Software
TRL Registered Office: Crowthorne House, Nine Mile Ride, Wokingham, Berks, UK, RG40 3GA. Registered in England, No. 3142272, VAT Registration 664 625 321.
© Copyright 2018 TRL. All rights reserved.
  • Sitemap
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Notice
  • Accessibility
Footer Menu