When is it no longer worth coordinating traffic signals (rule of thumb) - TRL Software
01344 379777software@trl.co.uk
TwitterYouTubeLinkedin
  • TRL Main Site
  • Careers
  • Publications
Top Menu
Search
Cart0
  • No products in the cart.

Subtotal: £0

View Cart Checkout

TRL SoftwareTRL Software
TRL Software
World Class Traffic & Transportation Software Solutions
  • Products
    • Junction & Signal Design
      • Junctions
        • ARCADY
        • PICADY
        • OSCADY
      • PCMOVA
      • TRANSYT
    • Traffic Control
      • MOVA
      • SCOOT®
      • Urban Traffic Control (UTC)
      • MotorGraph
    • Road Safety
      • iMAAP
      • Street Auditing
    • Economic Appraisal
      • HDM-4
    • Digital Asset Management
      • iROADS™
  • Services
    • Junction Analysis
    • Microsimulation Services
    • Signal Control
    • Road Danger Reduction
    • Software Development
    • Strategic Modelling
  • About
    • TRL Software
    • Quality Standards
    • Careers
  • News
  • Support
    • Training
    • Knowledge Base
    • Webinars
    • Videos
    • Support Options
    • Maintenance Agreement
    • Licensing
    • Online Store Help
    • Ideas Portal
    • FAQ
  • Contact
Menu back  
TRL Software > Support & Training > Articles > When is it no longer worth coordinating traffic signals (rule of thumb)

When is it no longer worth coordinating traffic signals (rule of thumb)

Question: I have a small network of signalised junctions that are quite a distance from each other. Is there a particular distance (or rule of thumb) beyond which coordinating the signals using TRANSYT is of no benefit?

Answer: No – there is no particular distance. The usefulness of TRANSYT will depend not on the distance between junctions but on how much the platooning of traffic remains intact along the link by the time it reaches the downstream stop line. Platooning is affected not just by distance but also by the amount of skin-friction along the link due to characteristics such as the presence of parked cars, bends or minor sources and sinks. The presence of more significant priority junctions can also contribute to this if they add significantly to the traffic already on the link. Although in this case you would probably want to model the give-way within TRANSYT too. Platooning is also significantly affected by the nature of the upstream junction. Good platooning is likely only if there is a dominant movement at that junction.

The only sure way to know how intact platoons remain along a link is to go out on-street and see what is actually happening by measuring cyclic flow profiles on street. The degree of platooning is easily seen from the data collected. Within TRANSYT itself the degree of platooning is indicated by the value of MME (Mean Modulus of Error). The MME value is given in the cyclic flow profile graphs. Whilst platoon dispersion due to differing speeds is modelled by TRANSYT, skin friction effects are not. So MME is a theoretical value. A value of MME close to its maximum of 2 indicates a high level of platooning so good coordination will be effective while a value of 0 indicates no platooning at all and hence no coordination benefits are possible. A ‘rule-of-thumb’ is that for any link with a MME value of 0.3 or less, it is probably not worth coordinating the signals. However, if on links, whether short or long, skin friction effects are significant, the MME value is not likely to be meaningful.

N.B. This article revised – Nov 2008

Categories
  • ARCADY Modelling
  • ARCADY/PICADY/OSCADY Technical
  • Other products
  • PICADY Modelling
  • TRANSYT Modelling
  • TRANSYT Network Diagrams
  • TRANSYT Technical
Recent Articles

  • TRANSYT 16 Simulation Model

  • Automatically calculating future traffic flows using growth factors

  • Graphs showing sensitivity of geometric parameters

  • How can I transfer traffic data between Junctions and Excel?

  • Pedestrian crossing and blocking on the same road

Stay up to date with news from TRL Software

Sign up
Products
  • Junction & Signal Design
  • Traffic Control
  • Road Safety
  • Economic Appraisal
  • Digital Asset Management
Services
  • Junction Analysis
  • Microsimulation Services
  • Signal Control
  • Road Danger Reduction
  • Software Development
  • Strategic Modelling
Contact Us

01344 379777
software@trl.co.uk

TRL Limited
Crowthorne House
Nine Mile Ride
Wokingham
Berkshire
RG40 3GA

TRL Software
TRL Registered Office: Crowthorne House, Nine Mile Ride, Wokingham, Berks, UK, RG40 3GA. Registered in England, No. 3142272, VAT Registration 664 625 321.
© Copyright 2021 TRL. All rights reserved.
  • Sitemap
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Notice
  • Accessibility
Footer Menu